Paulo Dybala (L) of Juventus vies with Luca Rossettini of Torino during the Italian Serie A soccer league match between Juventus and Torino at Juventus Stadium in Turin Air Vapormax Flyknit Sale , Italy, May 6 Air Vapormax Sale , 2017. The match ends with a 1-1 draw. (XinhuaAlberto Lingria)
Front part of C919 manufactured in China's Chengdu
Nearly 5,000 firefighters battle forest fire in Inner Mongolia
Monks receive donation from residents and tourists in China's Hangzhou
Snow scenery of Tianshan Mountains in China's Xinjiang
Key structure installed in HK-Zhuhai-Macao cross-sea bridge
Chinese naval fleet wraps up visit to Philippines
Cheongsam show held in north China's Shanxi
Maiden flight for C919 scheduled for May 5
LONDON， Nov. 3 (Xinhua) -- British Prime Minister Theresa May's plans to bring Britain out of the European Union (EU) were thrown into chaos Thursday.
The High Court in London ruled that parliament， and not May's government， should trigger the Article 50 mechanism to start the Brexit process.
The decision by three of the leading judges in Britain sent shock waves through Westminster， with government officials now studying the full judgement.
Within an hour of the decision， the government confirmed it would appeal by taking the case to the highest court in England， the Supreme Court.
Government lawyers have been given permission to "fast track" an appeal by by-passing the Court of Appeal and going instead to the Supreme Court.
A time slot in early December has already been set aside for an appeal hearing， with all 11 law lords sitting to decide the case.
An official government spokesman expressed disappointment in the High Court's judgment.
"The country voted to leave the European Union in a referendum approved by an Act of Parliament，" he said. "And the government is determined to respect the result of the referendum，" said the spokesman.
It is not yet known whether May's stated aim to trigger Article 50 by the end of next March can now be met.
A group of individuals who took the case to law to challenge May's Brexit plans were jubilant at the decision， describing it as a victory for parliamentary democracy. They urged the government not to appeal the decision in the Supreme Court.
Lawyer David Greene， one of the individuals who took the case to court， said that although he voted Brexit， his view was that parliament should be the body to trigger Article 50.
In the ruling Thursday， Lord Chief Justice Thomas said: "The government does not have power under the Crown's prerogative to give notice pursuant to Article 50 for the UK to withdraw from the European Union."
Jeremy Corbyn， leader of the main opposition Labour Party said: "This ruling underlines the need for the government to bring its negotiating terms to parliament without delay."
Nigel Farage， the former leader of the anti-EU party UKIP， said after the judgement: "I now fear every attempt will be made to block or delay triggering Article 50. They have no idea the level of public anger they will provoke. I think we could be at the beginning， with this ruling， of a process where there is a deliberate， wilful attempt by our political class to betray 17.4 million voters."
One legal expert has warned that the decision could mean Brexit would not even happen.
Professor Jon Tonge， professor of politics at the University of Liverpool， said: "The government may well appeal against the decision， but regardless， what it shows is that the battle for Brexit is far from over. Parliament will determine the terms on which we leave the EU. The lack of consensus over what any Brexit deal will look like may mean that ultimately it may never happen."
The issue has centered on who is responsible for implementing the will of the people， the government or parliament?
From the moment she became Prime Minister in July of this year， Theresa May's mantra became Brexit means Brexit and she would lead the people out of the EU. Political commentators are already speculating whether May will call an early general election to put her authority to the test.
One of the main things that draws spectators to sporting events is a sense of competitive finality. A cumulative score is kept and displayed for all to see Air Vapormax Flyknit Shoes , and at the end of the game, there is one winner and one loser.
Except for sports like gymnastics and figure skating Air Vapormax Shoes , which determine their winners via a panel of judges.
Does this provide the -potential for bias? Just ask any Olympic figure skater who's ever faced judges from an -unfriendly country.
And then there's boxing.
Once culturally significant in the US, boxing has now been relegated to a "niche sport" -status Air Vapormax Flyknit 2018 , known more for its -unsavory characters than its prime time events like Saturday's "Fight of the Century" between Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao.
For years, Mayweather -avoided fighting Pacquiao -altogether. So perhaps it was no surprise that he was evasive for most of their 12-round fight Air Vapormax 2018 , running away from Pacquiao, dodging punches before they were thrown and going into "turtle shell mode" on the numerous occasions that Pacquiao pummeled him into the ropes.
Fans all over the world assumed Pacquiao would be -declared the winner because of his aggressive Air Vapormax Flyknit Mens , attacking performance. Instead, the judges unanimously scored the bout in Mayweather's favor Air Vapormax Mens , prompting prolonged booing from the sold-out crowd. So-called journalist Max Kellerman -completed the charade by peppering a befuddled Pacquiao with rude and obnoxious post-fight questions.
Officials' decisions are part of the human element of sports, so some level of spectator -dissent is normal.
Ask St. Louis Cardinals fans about Don Denkinger's blown at first base during Game 6 of the 1985 World Series. Or Chicago Bulls fans about Hue Hollins' phantom foul call agai. Jerseys China Jerseys China Throwback NFL Jerseys From China Custom Soccer Jerseys From China New NHL Jerseys China New MLB Jerseys Cheap Sports Jerseys China Hockey Jerseys Free Shipping MLB Baseball Jerseys Online Authentic Jerseys From China